Read Reps spar over Quran usage first
How can he call himself an american or someone who understands the constitution? Constitution separates church and state and also America is the land of the free which also includes free from religious persecutions. That is exactly what the pilgrims wanted it to be and that is what America is. Didn't the people of Minnesota elect him to be their representative knowing that he is a muslim?
If this SOB (I don't feel anything for calling him like this) thinks that he could get away for saying racist comments and standing his ground as an elected representative, I feel sorry for the state of the nation. What is most troubling about this is that the RNC et al are remaining silent about this. For God's sake, say at least that you folks either support or reject this idealogies so that everyone understands where you folks stand.
For your reference, here the some excerpts from the article:
Ellison, a Democrat from Minnesota, said he planned to use the Quran only as part of an unofficial individual swearing-in before friends and supporters. That event will follow the official ceremony for all House members.
However, Rep. Virgil H. Goode Jr. is standing by his demand for strict immigration controls that he said would prevent Muslims from gaining a majority in Congress and using the Quran during swearing-in ceremonies.
He also said "When I raise my hand to take the oath on swearing-in day, I will have the Bible in my other hand," Goode wrote. "I do not subscribe to using the Quran in any way. ... If American citizens don't take up and adopt the Virgil Goode position on immigration, there will likely be many more Muslims elected to office and demanding the use of the Quran."
Decide for yourself.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment